New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rubygems should continue when a gemspec is missing ("gem generate_index") #264
Comments
patch for this issue is: https://gist.github.com/115d23122e5a6bb32ff6 |
Actually, this is a better patch, the one above breaks --update https://gist.github.com/76b401c35dd951253f8e |
@evanphx can you pull this into the next 1.8 release? |
@drbrain I was waiting on some tests before pulling this in. Should I wait or pull it in now, sans tests? |
I think it's safe without a patch, but I've bugged @slyphon in IRC |
I have been informed that I will write tests for this… |
@drbrain I shall await your tests then. |
Is this issue still valid? If it is, has there been any movement on it? |
I don't think this is a bug anymore. I attempted to reproduce and was unable to. From the bug report it looks like it In |
As discussed in #ruby-lang
the output of ls gems/rake*.gem:
the output of
for f in gems/*.gem; do echo -n $f ' '; gem spec $f name ; done
(filtered with|grep rake
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: