Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define group/LFN correspondence check #6015

Closed
dynamic-entropy opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Define group/LFN correspondence check #6015

dynamic-entropy opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@dynamic-entropy
Copy link
Contributor

Description

We need to add additional checks for group scopes and lfns similar to what is done for user scopes.

https://github.com/rucio/rucio/blob/9ae42908a0e188ece017bfec1b89cf2e354b383e/lib/rucio/common/schema/cms.py#L443-#L465

Motivation

No response

Change

No response

@dynamic-entropy
Copy link
Contributor Author

dynamic-entropy commented Dec 7, 2022

Hi @bari12
I think a CMS tag would be more appropriate for the issue.
Or is it ok if I use the enhancement component in my commit message?

dynamic-entropy added a commit to dynamic-entropy/rucio that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2022
dynamic-entropy added a commit to dynamic-entropy/rucio that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2022
dynamic-entropy added a commit to dynamic-entropy/rucio that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2022
@bari12
Copy link
Member

bari12 commented Jan 9, 2023

@dynamic-entropy we can also add the CMS tag. :-)

dynamic-entropy added a commit to dynamic-entropy/rucio that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2023
dynamic-entropy added a commit to dynamic-entropy/rucio that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2023
dynamic-entropy added a commit to dynamic-entropy/rucio that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2023
dynamic-entropy added a commit to dynamic-entropy/rucio that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2023
@bari12 bari12 closed this as completed in ac8ef5f Feb 15, 2023
@bari12 bari12 added this to the 1.30.6 milestone Feb 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants