-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why do we have wiki2-technical rusefi_documentation public #165
Comments
Depends on #166 |
@chuckwagoncomputing I've just made https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi_documentation/ public again because of
|
FWIW, having rusefi_documentation makes contributing to documentation via PR possible for people who aren't part of the documentation group. |
@chuckwagoncomputing huh? I believe that anyone can edit rusEFI wiki, at least the text part? I am not sure how can people upload images via www to be honest. |
Are you referring to the wiki at github.com/rusefi/rusefi/wiki or the wiki at https://rusefi.com/docs/wiki/Home/? |
not member of https://github.com/orgs/rusefi/teams/doc-team/members |
so we have two questions Q1: why do we need rusefi_documentation NOW, "before" wiki3 Q2: would rusefi_documentation be used for wiki3? technically we can have http://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/wiki be the source for wiki3 generation. I am not proposing I am only saying that I do not understand what is the best/only way for future workflow |
Re: Q2: |
Closing @mck1117 @mi-hol @chuckwagoncomputing FYI. |
Q1: does anyone remember if we need rusefi_documentation at all?
Q2: shall we make it private in order to reduce google search results mess?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: