Add ros_console_bridge package

[lsolanka]

I've followed this guide step by step carefully, until section CI Testing, which instructs me to create several branches based on the package name.

I stopped there because I would first like to get feedback on package naming: The original repository is called console_bridge (https://github.com/ros/console_bridge) but I thought because this is part of ROS, each package could have ros- prepended to its name, i.e. in this case ros-console_bridge, to distinguish the set of ROS-related packages.

I'm not sure if that is desired so I thought I would first open the PR and then when the package names are clarified I would finish the CI build.

This PR is part of this "New package" request: #1397.

[ruslo]

The original repository is called console_bridge (https://github.com/ros/console_bridge) but I thought because this is part of ROS, each package could have ros- prepended to its name

Yes, I guess so. Actually it probably make sense to rename ros related forks. What do you think?

[lsolanka]

Actually it probably make sense to rename ros related forks. What do you think?

Agree, that would make all naming consistent. I checked if I can do it but don't see the 'Settings' button on those forks so I guess I don't have permissions.

[ruslo]

Renamed.

I kept names for:

• https://github.com/hunter-packages/catkin
• https://github.com/hunter-packages/angles (C++ namespace angles inside)
• https://github.com/hunter-packages/geometry2 (C++ namespace tf2 inside, should it be named tf2?)

[lsolanka]

https://github.com/hunter-packages/geometry2 (C++ namespace tf2 inside, should it be named tf2?)

Sounds good to me to rename. It contains only tf2_* and a geometry2 metapackage which other catkin packages cannot depend on anyway (catkin policy).

So the users would then do:

hunter_add_package(tf2)
find_package(catkin COMPONENTS tf2 tf2_ros) # or just find_package(tf2) if they prefer not to use catkin

https://github.com/hunter-packages/catkin

Sounds fine as well, users would then do:

hunter_add_package(catkin)
find_package(catkin COMPONENTS catkin_pkg1 catkin_pkg2)

which is more natural than hunter_add_package(ros_catkin) and then find_package(catkin)

Also if catkin and tf2 do not have a ros_ prefix, I would suggest to keep actionlib with the original name instead of ros_actionlib. This way, the usual set of packages required in 90% of situations would be:

hunter_add_package(catkin)
hunter_add_package(ros_comm)
hunter_add_package(actionlib)
hunter_add_package(tf2)

[ruslo]

Repositories renamed, please check.

[lsolanka]

Looks good.

[lsolanka]

Finished ingenue#224 (testing), I think this is ready for review. I hope I didn't forget anything.

[ruslo]

Use 1403 instead of N

[ruslo]

Testing:

• https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ingenue/hunter/build/1.0.3621
• https://travis-ci.org/ingenue/hunter/builds/366850780?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification

[ruslo]

Uploading:

• https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ingenue/hunter/build/1.0.3624
• https://travis-ci.org/ingenue/hunter/builds/366867648?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification

[ruslo]

Released: https://github.com/ruslo/hunter/releases/tag/v0.20.41