Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v1.0.0 release #19

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 11, 2022
Merged

v1.0.0 release #19

merged 1 commit into from Aug 11, 2022

Conversation

Dirbaio
Copy link
Member

@Dirbaio Dirbaio commented Aug 10, 2022

Depends on #18

@eldruin
Copy link
Member

eldruin commented Aug 11, 2022

Could you rebase this?

@Dirbaio
Copy link
Member Author

Dirbaio commented Aug 11, 2022

Rebased 🚀

Copy link
Member

@eldruin eldruin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉
bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Aug 11, 2022

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot merged commit 415cd0f into main Aug 11, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the release-v1 branch August 11, 2022 14:29
bors bot added a commit to rust-embedded/cortex-m that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2022
448: Add implementation for critical-section 1.0, for cortex-m v0.7.x r=adamgreig a=Dirbaio

This is a subset of #447 without any breaking changes, just adding the `critical-section` implementation.

The goal is to release it in 0.7.6 so `critical-section` becomes usable without having to wait for cortex-m 0.8.


TODO before merging:

- [x] Wait for `critical-section 1.0` release rust-embedded/critical-section#19

Co-authored-by: Dario Nieuwenhuis <dirbaio@dirbaio.net>
bors bot added a commit to rust-embedded/cortex-m that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2022
447: Add implementation for critical-section 1.0 r=adamgreig a=Dirbaio

Picking up #433 since it seems stalled. Changes from #433 are:
- Update to `critical-section 1.0.0-alpha.2`
- Use `bool` restore token
- Name Cargo feature `critical-section-single-core`.

TODO before merging:

- [x] Wait for `critical-section 1.0` release rust-embedded/critical-section#19

Co-Authored-By: Markus Reiter `@reitermarkus` 

Co-authored-by: Dario Nieuwenhuis <dirbaio@dirbaio.net>
bors bot added a commit to rust-embedded/cortex-m that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2022
447: Add implementation for critical-section 1.0 r=adamgreig a=Dirbaio

Picking up #433 since it seems stalled. Changes from #433 are:
- Update to `critical-section 1.0.0-alpha.2`
- Use `bool` restore token
- Name Cargo feature `critical-section-single-core`.

TODO before merging:

- [x] Wait for `critical-section 1.0` release rust-embedded/critical-section#19

Co-Authored-By: Markus Reiter `@reitermarkus` 

Co-authored-by: Dario Nieuwenhuis <dirbaio@dirbaio.net>
bors bot added a commit to knurling-rs/defmt that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2022
689: defmt-rtt: Update to critical-section 1.0 r=Urhengulas a=Dirbaio

This is a breaking change, because 1.0 no longer supplies any critical section implementation by default. The user has to opt-in to one instead (for example, by enabling the `critical-section-single-core` feature in `cortex-m`: rust-embedded/cortex-m#447).

Thankfully it needs bumping only `defmt-rtt`, and not `defmt`. So it won't cause the painful ecosystem split like the `defmt 0.2 -> 0.3` update.

TODO before merging:

- [x] Wait for `critical-section 1.0` release rust-embedded/critical-section#19

Co-authored-by: Dario Nieuwenhuis <dirbaio@dirbaio.net>
bors bot added a commit to nrf-rs/nrf-usbd that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2022
9: Update to critical-section 1.0 r=jonas-schievink a=Dirbaio

This is a breaking change, because 1.0 no longer supplies any critical section implementation by default. The user has to opt-in to one instead (for example, by enabling the `critical-section-single-core` feature in `cortex-m`: rust-embedded/cortex-m#447 (comment)).

TODO before merging:

- [x] Wait for `critical-section 1.0` release rust-embedded/critical-section#19

Co-authored-by: Dario Nieuwenhuis <dirbaio@dirbaio.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants