Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(toml)!: Disallow source-less dependencies #13775

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 18, 2024

Conversation

epage
Copy link
Contributor

@epage epage commented Apr 18, 2024

What does this PR try to resolve?

This is part of #13629 addressing “dependency without path, version, git, workspace specified”.

This turns deps like

foo = { optional = true }

from version="*" deps with a warning into errors. This breaking change was deemed acceptable because this behavior has been considered a bug from the beginning.
We have gotten little to no feedback about people wanting this behavior.

This improves our forwards-compatibility story as we can add new dependency sources and they won't be considered a wildcard registry dependency on older cargo.

How should we test and review this PR?

I removed the cargo_add test because it is redundant.

We no longer get the “unused key” warnings because those warnings get deferred to after this error gets reported.

Additional information

This is part of rust-lang#13629

This turns deps like
```toml
foo = { optional = true }
```
from `version="*"` deps with a warning into errors.
This breaking change was deemed acceptable because this behavior has
been considered a bug from the beginning.
We have gotten little to no feedback about people wanting this behavior.

This improves our forwards-compatibility story as we can add new
dependency sources and they won't be considered a wildcard registry
dependency on older cargo.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 18, 2024

r? @ehuss

rustbot has assigned @ehuss.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added A-manifest Area: Cargo.toml issues S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 18, 2024
@@ -1672,14 +1672,11 @@ fn detailed_dep_to_dependency<P: ResolveToPath + Clone>(
kind: Option<DepKind>,
) -> CargoResult<Dependency> {
if orig.version.is_none() && orig.path.is_none() && orig.git.is_none() {
let msg = format!(
"dependency ({}) specified without \
anyhow::bail!(
Copy link
Member

@weihanglo weihanglo Apr 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Question: What's the criteria of turning this into

  • a normal warning
  • a critical warning that bails out later
  • a fatal error bailing out here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

turning this into a normal warning

This was already a warning, so no change there

a fatal error bailing out here

When we discussed #13629 as a team, we seemed in favor of a hard error as this was deemed a bug that people haven't been clamoring for us to continue to support.

a critical warning that bails out later

I honestly haven't touched that system much. I think those "recoverable errors", right? As in, we continue moving forward, seeing other messages, and but fail after all of that?

While I would want to move more towards error recovery, this has some weird properties

  • These only show up when emit_warnings is called which looks to only be compile commands and cargo fetch
  • The overall value of error recovery seems relatively low (not much more is really going to be shown but instead people might see other unrelated warnings)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the clarification. I understand this being a fatal error as a team decision. The recovery error is something I am also thinking about, yet it doesn't apply to this situation.

@weihanglo
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 18, 2024

📌 Commit cf23e4b has been approved by weihanglo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 18, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 18, 2024

⌛ Testing commit cf23e4b with merge 7e9c2ef...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 18, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: weihanglo
Pushing 7e9c2ef to master...

@bors bors merged commit 7e9c2ef into rust-lang:master Apr 18, 2024
23 checks passed
@epage epage deleted the incomplete-dep branch April 19, 2024 01:26
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
Update cargo

8 commits in 6f06fe908a5ee0f415c187f868ea627e82efe07d..80d5b607dde6ef97dfff4e23923822c01d2bb036
2024-04-16 18:47:44 +0000 to 2024-04-19 18:39:22 +0000
- fix 13773 - 'cargo build' fails when list_files() with gix is triggered (rust-lang/cargo#13777)
- fix(toml): Don't crash on parse errors that point to multi-byte character (rust-lang/cargo#13780)
- fix(toml)!: Disallow source-less dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#13775)
- fix(msrv): Put MSRV-aware resolver behind a config (rust-lang/cargo#13769)
- fix(msrv): Error, rather than panic, on rust-version 'x' (rust-lang/cargo#13771)
- fix(credential): trim newlines in tokens from stdin (rust-lang/cargo#13770)
- test(msrv): Re-organize MSRV tests (rust-lang/cargo#13767)
- feat(install): Including Locking message (rust-lang/cargo#13764)

r? ghost
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
Update cargo

8 commits in 6f06fe908a5ee0f415c187f868ea627e82efe07d..80d5b607dde6ef97dfff4e23923822c01d2bb036
2024-04-16 18:47:44 +0000 to 2024-04-19 18:39:22 +0000
- fix 13773 - 'cargo build' fails when list_files() with gix is triggered (rust-lang/cargo#13777)
- fix(toml): Don't crash on parse errors that point to multi-byte character (rust-lang/cargo#13780)
- fix(toml)!: Disallow source-less dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#13775)
- fix(msrv): Put MSRV-aware resolver behind a config (rust-lang/cargo#13769)
- fix(msrv): Error, rather than panic, on rust-version 'x' (rust-lang/cargo#13771)
- fix(credential): trim newlines in tokens from stdin (rust-lang/cargo#13770)
- test(msrv): Re-organize MSRV tests (rust-lang/cargo#13767)
- feat(install): Including Locking message (rust-lang/cargo#13764)

r? ghost
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2024
Update cargo

8 commits in 6f06fe908a5ee0f415c187f868ea627e82efe07d..80d5b607dde6ef97dfff4e23923822c01d2bb036
2024-04-16 18:47:44 +0000 to 2024-04-19 18:39:22 +0000
- fix 13773 - 'cargo build' fails when list_files() with gix is triggered (rust-lang/cargo#13777)
- fix(toml): Don't crash on parse errors that point to multi-byte character (rust-lang/cargo#13780)
- fix(toml)!: Disallow source-less dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#13775)
- fix(msrv): Put MSRV-aware resolver behind a config (rust-lang/cargo#13769)
- fix(msrv): Error, rather than panic, on rust-version 'x' (rust-lang/cargo#13771)
- fix(credential): trim newlines in tokens from stdin (rust-lang/cargo#13770)
- test(msrv): Re-organize MSRV tests (rust-lang/cargo#13767)
- feat(install): Including Locking message (rust-lang/cargo#13764)

r? ghost
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Apr 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-manifest Area: Cargo.toml issues S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants