-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 270
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expose RawTable publically #104
Comments
Could you give a bit more detail regarding the ownership semantics for your hash map? I'm somewhat open to the idea, but the current |
I would also like it, to have direct (unsafe) access to the entries by index. |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2019
Experimentally expose RawTable under the "raw" feature Fixes #104
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I find myself in the need of writing a hash map with some custom ownership semantics in regards to keys.
Your internal
RawTable
seems to provide exactly the functionality I, with enough flexibility to provide the custom semantics I need.Would you be open to exposing
RawTable
publically, possibly behind a feature flag? I do realize that the API most likely is very unstable and may change, but this is something I would be willing to deal with.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: