-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document ra_syntax::ast API #3682
Labels
Comments
As the ast is generated, the docs should actually go to https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/blob/master/xtask/src/ast_src.rs |
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 31, 2020
3780: Simplify r=matklad a=Veetaha I absolutely love tha fact that removing `.clone()` simplifies the code comparing to other languages where it's actually the contrary (ahem ~~`std::move()`~~) 3787: vscode: add syntax tree inspection hovers and highlights r=matklad a=Veetaha ![inspect-tree](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/36276403/78029767-c7426900-7369-11ea-9ed6-b8a0f8e05bac.gif) I implemented the reverse mapping (when you hover in the rust editor), but it seems overcomplicated, so I removed it Related #3682 Co-authored-by: veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
This was referenced Apr 2, 2020
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 2, 2020
3817: vscode: highlight syntax tree ro editor r=matklad a=Veetaha Small textmate grammar declaration to make rust-analyzer syntax tree more easily inspectable: Btw, if we change the file extension of our `ra_syntax/test_data/**` files to `.rast` they should be highlighted in vscode too. The colors of the tokens are actually going to be color-theme dependent, or you can customize them via: ```jsonc { "editor.tokenColorCustomizations": { "textMateRules": [ { "scope": "name", "settings": { /* */ } } ] } } ``` ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/36276403/78204947-99f9d600-74a3-11ea-8315-cb1c87810c7c.png) Related: #3682 Co-authored-by: veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 2, 2020
3816: vscode: add goto ast node definition from rust source code r=Veetaha a=Veetaha By holding the `Ctrl` key you can now goto-definition of the appropriate syntax token in the syntax tree read-only editor. But actually going to the definition is not very convenient, since it opens the new editor, you'd rather just hold the `Ctrl` and look at the syntax tree because it is automatically scrolled to the proper node and the node itself is enclosed with text selection. Unfortunately, the algorithm is very simple (because we don't do any elaborate parsing of the syntax tree text received from the server), but it is enough to debug not very large source files. I tested the performance and in a bad case (rust source file with 5K lines of code) it takes `1.3` seconds to build the `rust -> ast` mapping index (lazily once on the first goto definition request) and each lookup in this worst-case is approx `20-120` ms. I think this is good enough. In the simple case where the file is < 100 lines of code, it is instant. One peculiarity that I've noticed is that vscode doesn't trigger the goto-definition provider when the user triggers it on some punctuation characters (i.e. it doesn't underline them and invoke te goto-definition provider), but if you explicitly click `Ctrl+LMB` it will only then invoke the provider and navigate to the definition in a new editor. I think this is fine ;D ![rust2ast](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/36276403/78198718-24d1d500-7492-11ea-91f6-2687cedf26ee.gif) Related: #3682 Co-authored-by: veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
This was referenced Apr 18, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
I wish we had some docs on ast node types, at least an example source code that shows to which kind of symbols the node referes to.
E.g. the difference between
Name
andNameRef
is not very evident, doesParenType
pertain to unnamed tuples or tuple structs too and all these kinds of questions arise...I suppose the ast api is quite stable already so we might want to better document it.
See the reference from matlkad
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: