Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support blocklisting __BindgenBitfieldUnit #2836

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

ian-h-chamberlain
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #2835

Simply skip emitting it if the list of blocklisted types/items matches its name.

Also add a test that verifies blocklisting anonymous types by _bindgen_ty_* works as expected – which could be used to prevent similar conflicts between generated type names for anonymous types.

Simply skip emitting it if the list of blocklisted types/items matches
its name.

Also add a test that verifies blocklisting anonymous types by
`_bindgen_ty_*` works as expected.
@emilio emilio added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:main with commit 9452ba1 Jun 18, 2024
33 checks passed
@ian-h-chamberlain ian-h-chamberlain deleted the feature/skip-bitfield-unit branch June 18, 2024 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for one set of bindings depending on another (conflicting __BindgenBitfieldUnit)
2 participants