Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't lint implicit_clone when the type doesn't implement clone #10022

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2022

Conversation

Jarcho
Copy link
Contributor

@Jarcho Jarcho commented Dec 2, 2022

fixes #10019
changelog: implicit_clone: Don't lint when the type doesn't implement clone

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 2, 2022

r? @giraffate

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Dec 2, 2022
@giraffate
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 2, 2022

📌 Commit ab8c6be has been approved by giraffate

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 2, 2022

⌛ Testing commit ab8c6be with merge 38fce12...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 2, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: giraffate
Pushing 38fce12 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 38fce12 into rust-lang:master Dec 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

implicit-clone: PartialEq not impl'd for &Ty
4 participants