Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove bors.toml #3668

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 18, 2019
Merged

Remove bors.toml #3668

merged 1 commit into from Jan 18, 2019

Conversation

phansch
Copy link
Member

@phansch phansch commented Jan 17, 2019

This file was only needed for bors-ng, but now we use the default
rust-lang bors fork.

This file was only needed for bors-ng, but now we use the default
rust-lang bors fork.
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 17, 2019

📌 Commit e08c095 has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 17, 2019

⌛ Testing commit e08c095 with merge a4a5135...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2019
Remove bors.toml

This file was only needed for bors-ng, but now we use the default
rust-lang bors fork.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 18, 2019

💥 Test timed out

@phansch
Copy link
Member Author

phansch commented Jan 18, 2019

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 18, 2019

⌛ Testing commit e08c095 with merge f48e605...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2019
Remove bors.toml

This file was only needed for bors-ng, but now we use the default
rust-lang bors fork.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 18, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing f48e605 to master...

@bors bors merged commit e08c095 into rust-lang:master Jan 18, 2019
@phansch phansch deleted the remove_bors_toml branch January 18, 2019 08:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants