Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add workspace to manifest #6733

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2021
Merged

Add workspace to manifest #6733

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2021

Conversation

camsteffen
Copy link
Contributor

changelog: none

This fixes the dogfood test to include clippy_lints (regression from #6687).

r? @flip1995

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Feb 12, 2021
Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@camsteffen
Copy link
Contributor Author

I went on a long research trait to figure out the build errors. I found dtolnay/trybuild#13 and rust-lang/rust#73603 to be interesting. @Manishearth do you think it is possible that using an up-to-date compiletest would fix the build errors here? Is it feasible to do rust-lang/rust#73603 soon or is that a lot of work?

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Note that there's an active Clippy PR to update our compiletest dependency

But I would dearly love to split compiletest out, yes. I think it's feasible but a bunch of work

@camsteffen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note that there's an active Clippy PR to update our compiletest dependency

Oh! Can you link to it? I suppose I should at least wait for that.

I think it's feasible but a bunch of work

Is there a more feasible version where compiletest is included just like any rustc_* module?

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

The compiletest update was already merged: #6743 Not sure if it includes the features we want/need for this PR though.

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Manishearth commented Feb 16, 2021

@camsteffen hmm, unsure about rustc_. It's worth a try, I don't think it will work automatically but it might be doable with some work.

But really I feel like it's better for everyone if compiletest is moved out of tree. But you should still feel free to move on making the other thing happen!

@camsteffen
Copy link
Contributor Author

camsteffen commented Feb 16, 2021

Excluding mini-macro fixed the build errors. I'm not sure why RUSTC_WORKSPACE_WRAPPER=.. cargo .. produced a different target for mini-macro 🤷. Maybe something to do with the fact that it's a proc-macro.

Excluding clippy-dev is necessary to avoid

error: current package believes it's in a workspace when it's not

@camsteffen
Copy link
Contributor Author

A possible follow-up change is to change our automated tests to use cargo test --all and remove the clippy_lints and rustc_tools_util tests?

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2021
Test workspace at once

changelog: none

Follow-up to #6733
@bors bors merged commit 9bcb257 into rust-lang:master Feb 16, 2021
@camsteffen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Whoops didn't mean to pull a fast one but this got merged in #6749 😄

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

@camsteffen @Manishearth This broke Clippy in rust-lang/rust:

error: multiple workspace roots found in the same workspace:
  /home/pkrones/rust-lang/rust/src/tools/clippy
  /home/pkrones/rust-lang/rust
failed to run: /home/pkrones/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo build --manifest-path /home/pkrones/rust-lang/rust/src/bootstrap/Cargo.toml
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:01:01

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Argh, I had assumed this would happen but thought people had a reason why it wouldn't given all the discussion. Revert and self-r+ I guess?

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

I don't think we can do this. This is the fix, so that dogfood actually is run on Clippy. So we need a solution, not involving workspaces. I just removed the workspace in the Clippy update in rustc for now: rust-lang/rust#82514 This gives us 2 weeks to fix this.

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2021
Remove workspace and fix dogfood (again)

changelog: none

In response to #6733 (comment)
@camsteffen camsteffen deleted the workspace branch July 8, 2021 22:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants