Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make shadow_reuse suggestion less verbose #7782

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2021

Conversation

dswij
Copy link
Member

@dswij dswij commented Oct 7, 2021

Closes #7764

Make shadow_reuse suggestion less verbose.

changelog: [shadow_reuse] does not warn shadowing statement

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @flip1995

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 7, 2021
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Oct 7, 2021

@bors r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 7, 2021

📌 Commit 64f8b9d has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 7, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 64f8b9d with merge 872f321...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 7, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 872f321 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 872f321 into rust-lang:master Oct 7, 2021
@dswij dswij deleted the shadow-unrelated-block branch September 8, 2022 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

shadow_unrelated: entire match statement in warning instead of just var name
4 participants