Fix #7903 #7906
Fix #7903 #7906
Conversation
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
That is a negative test because caching the string might be faster than calling |
clippy_utils/src/higher.rs
Outdated
| if let Ok(i) = usize::try_from(position); | ||
| let arg = &self.args[i]; | ||
| if let ExprKind::Call(_, [arg_name, _]) = arg.kind; | ||
| if let Some(j) = self.arg_names.iter().position(|pat| match_arg(pat, arg_name)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should work
| if let Some(j) = self.arg_names.iter().position(|pat| match_arg(pat, arg_name)); | |
| if let Some(j) = self.arg_names.iter().position(|pat| path_to_local_id(arg_name, pat.hir_id)); |
| @@ -557,13 +559,15 @@ impl FormatArgsExpn<'tcx> { | |||
| _ => None, | |||
| }) | |||
| .collect(); | |||
| if let PatKind::Tuple(arg_names, None) = arm.pat.kind; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is okay for now since it fixes an ICE, but note that we want to move away from depending on the exact HIR per #7843.
|
|
||
| println!("error: something failed at {}", Somewhere.to_string()); | ||
| println!("{} and again {0}", x.to_string()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
See my other comment on this. Comments would be helpful here. One to separate // negative tests and one to explain the intent behind this test since it isn't obvious.
smoelius
changed the title
to_string_in_format_args false negative
smoelius
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
e6cd02d
to
61bb9b6
Compare
|
I think I've addressed all of your comments, @camsteffen. Thanks a lot for reviewing this. |
|
Thanks! I added a changelog line to the PR. @bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 5edb02a has been approved by |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test |
Fixes #7903 (cc: @Arnavion)
changelog: none (bug is in same release)
r? @camsteffen