/
impl_wf_check.rs
205 lines (188 loc) · 8.31 KB
/
impl_wf_check.rs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
// Copyright 2012-2014 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.
//! This pass enforces various "well-formedness constraints" on impls.
//! Logically, it is part of wfcheck -- but we do it early so that we
//! can stop compilation afterwards, since part of the trait matching
//! infrastructure gets very grumpy if these conditions don't hold. In
//! particular, if there are type parameters that are not part of the
//! impl, then coherence will report strange inference ambiguity
//! errors; if impls have duplicate items, we get misleading
//! specialization errors. These things can (and probably should) be
//! fixed, but for the moment it's easier to do these checks early.
use constrained_type_params as ctp;
use rustc::dep_graph::DepNode;
use rustc::hir;
use rustc::hir::itemlikevisit::ItemLikeVisitor;
use rustc::hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc::ty;
use rustc::util::nodemap::{FxHashMap, FxHashSet};
use std::collections::hash_map::Entry::{Occupied, Vacant};
use syntax_pos::Span;
use CrateCtxt;
/// Checks that all the type/lifetime parameters on an impl also
/// appear in the trait ref or self-type (or are constrained by a
/// where-clause). These rules are needed to ensure that, given a
/// trait ref like `<T as Trait<U>>`, we can derive the values of all
/// parameters on the impl (which is needed to make specialization
/// possible).
///
/// However, in the case of lifetimes, we only enforce these rules if
/// the lifetime parameter is used in an associated type. This is a
/// concession to backwards compatibility; see comment at the end of
/// the fn for details.
///
/// Example:
///
/// ```
/// impl<T> Trait<Foo> for Bar { ... }
/// ^ T does not appear in `Foo` or `Bar`, error!
///
/// impl<T> Trait<Foo<T>> for Bar { ... }
/// ^ T appears in `Foo<T>`, ok.
///
/// impl<T> Trait<Foo> for Bar where Bar: Iterator<Item=T> { ... }
/// ^ T is bound to `<Bar as Iterator>::Item`, ok.
///
/// impl<'a> Trait<Foo> for Bar { }
/// ^ 'a is unused, but for back-compat we allow it
///
/// impl<'a> Trait<Foo> for Bar { type X = &'a i32; }
/// ^ 'a is unused and appears in assoc type, error
/// ```
pub fn impl_wf_check<'a, 'tcx>(ccx: &CrateCtxt<'a, 'tcx>) {
// We will tag this as part of the WF check -- logically, it is,
// but it's one that we must perform earlier than the rest of
// WfCheck.
ccx.tcx.visit_all_item_likes_in_krate(DepNode::WfCheck, &mut ImplWfCheck { ccx: ccx });
}
struct ImplWfCheck<'a, 'tcx: 'a> {
ccx: &'a CrateCtxt<'a, 'tcx>,
}
impl<'a, 'tcx> ItemLikeVisitor<'tcx> for ImplWfCheck<'a, 'tcx> {
fn visit_item(&mut self, item: &'tcx hir::Item) {
match item.node {
hir::ItemImpl(.., ref generics, _, _, ref impl_item_refs) => {
let impl_def_id = self.ccx.tcx.hir.local_def_id(item.id);
enforce_impl_params_are_constrained(self.ccx,
generics,
impl_def_id,
impl_item_refs);
enforce_impl_items_are_distinct(self.ccx, impl_item_refs);
}
_ => { }
}
}
fn visit_trait_item(&mut self, _trait_item: &'tcx hir::TraitItem) { }
fn visit_impl_item(&mut self, _impl_item: &'tcx hir::ImplItem) { }
}
fn enforce_impl_params_are_constrained<'a, 'tcx>(ccx: &CrateCtxt<'a, 'tcx>,
impl_hir_generics: &hir::Generics,
impl_def_id: DefId,
impl_item_refs: &[hir::ImplItemRef])
{
// Every lifetime used in an associated type must be constrained.
let impl_self_ty = ccx.tcx.item_type(impl_def_id);
let impl_generics = ccx.tcx.item_generics(impl_def_id);
let impl_predicates = ccx.tcx.item_predicates(impl_def_id);
let impl_trait_ref = ccx.tcx.impl_trait_ref(impl_def_id);
let mut input_parameters = ctp::parameters_for_impl(impl_self_ty, impl_trait_ref);
ctp::identify_constrained_type_params(
&impl_predicates.predicates.as_slice(), impl_trait_ref, &mut input_parameters);
// Disallow ANY unconstrained type parameters.
for (ty_param, param) in impl_generics.types.iter().zip(&impl_hir_generics.ty_params) {
let param_ty = ty::ParamTy::for_def(ty_param);
if !input_parameters.contains(&ctp::Parameter::from(param_ty)) {
report_unused_parameter(ccx, param.span, "type", ¶m_ty.to_string());
}
}
// Disallow unconstrained lifetimes, but only if they appear in assoc types.
let lifetimes_in_associated_types: FxHashSet<_> = impl_item_refs.iter()
.map(|item_ref| ccx.tcx.hir.local_def_id(item_ref.id.node_id))
.filter(|&def_id| {
let item = ccx.tcx.associated_item(def_id);
item.kind == ty::AssociatedKind::Type && item.defaultness.has_value()
})
.flat_map(|def_id| {
ctp::parameters_for(&ccx.tcx.item_type(def_id), true)
}).collect();
for (ty_lifetime, lifetime) in impl_generics.regions.iter()
.zip(&impl_hir_generics.lifetimes)
{
let param = ctp::Parameter::from(ty_lifetime.to_early_bound_region_data());
if
lifetimes_in_associated_types.contains(¶m) && // (*)
!input_parameters.contains(¶m)
{
report_unused_parameter(ccx, lifetime.lifetime.span,
"lifetime", &lifetime.lifetime.name.to_string());
}
}
// (*) This is a horrible concession to reality. I think it'd be
// better to just ban unconstrianed lifetimes outright, but in
// practice people do non-hygenic macros like:
//
// ```
// macro_rules! __impl_slice_eq1 {
// ($Lhs: ty, $Rhs: ty, $Bound: ident) => {
// impl<'a, 'b, A: $Bound, B> PartialEq<$Rhs> for $Lhs where A: PartialEq<B> {
// ....
// }
// }
// }
// ```
//
// In a concession to backwards compatbility, we continue to
// permit those, so long as the lifetimes aren't used in
// associated types. I believe this is sound, because lifetimes
// used elsewhere are not projected back out.
}
fn report_unused_parameter(ccx: &CrateCtxt,
span: Span,
kind: &str,
name: &str)
{
struct_span_err!(
ccx.tcx.sess, span, E0207,
"the {} parameter `{}` is not constrained by the \
impl trait, self type, or predicates",
kind, name)
.span_label(span, &format!("unconstrained {} parameter", kind))
.emit();
}
/// Enforce that we do not have two items in an impl with the same name.
fn enforce_impl_items_are_distinct<'a, 'tcx>(ccx: &CrateCtxt<'a, 'tcx>,
impl_item_refs: &[hir::ImplItemRef])
{
let tcx = ccx.tcx;
let mut seen_type_items = FxHashMap();
let mut seen_value_items = FxHashMap();
for impl_item_ref in impl_item_refs {
let impl_item = tcx.hir.impl_item(impl_item_ref.id);
let seen_items = match impl_item.node {
hir::ImplItemKind::Type(_) => &mut seen_type_items,
_ => &mut seen_value_items,
};
match seen_items.entry(impl_item.name) {
Occupied(entry) => {
let mut err = struct_span_err!(tcx.sess, impl_item.span, E0201,
"duplicate definitions with name `{}`:",
impl_item.name);
err.span_label(*entry.get(),
&format!("previous definition of `{}` here",
impl_item.name));
err.span_label(impl_item.span, &format!("duplicate definition"));
err.emit();
}
Vacant(entry) => {
entry.insert(impl_item.span);
}
}
}
}