Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

'inconsistent target specification' on custom .json target #78981

Closed
MarimeGui opened this issue Nov 12, 2020 · 6 comments · Fixed by #78993
Closed

'inconsistent target specification' on custom .json target #78981

MarimeGui opened this issue Nov 12, 2020 · 6 comments · Fixed by #78993
Labels
A-target-specs Area: compile-target specifications C-bug Category: This is a bug. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@MarimeGui
Copy link

Hello everyone, this is my first Issue on the Rust project, let me know if I'm doing anthing wrong !

Problem

I am in the process of building a library/runtime for the Wii fully written in Rust. To acheive this goal, I need to cross-compile my library to a custom target I named powerpc-none-eabi.

The json file contains "target-endian": "big" and "data-layout": "E-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-n32" along other lines to define the architecture.

Normally, the build completes without an issue.

On the latest nighlty, the compiler fails and return:

PS S:\Code\ppc_ill> cargo build -Z build-std=core,alloc --target .\powerpc-none-eabi.json --release
error: failed to run `rustc` to learn about target-specific information

Caused by:
  process didn't exit successfully: `rustc - --crate-name ___ --print=file-names --target \\?\S:\Code\ppc_ill\powerpc-none-eabi.json --crate-type bin --crate-type rlib --crate-type dylib --crate-type cdylib --crate-type staticlib --crate-type proc-macro --print=sysroot --print=cfg` (exit code: 1)
  --- stderr
  error: inconsistent target specification: "data-layout" claims architecture is big-endian, while "target-endian" is `little`

Of course, target-endian is set to big in the file, so this shouldn't happen.

Version it worked on

It most recently worked on:

rustc --version --verbose:

rustc 1.49.0-nightly (1773f60ea 2020-11-08)
binary: rustc
commit-hash: 1773f60ea5d42e86b8fdf78d2fc5221ead222bc1
commit-date: 2020-11-08
host: x86_64-pc-windows-msvc
release: 1.49.0-nightly

Version with regression

It fails on this nightly, currently latest at the time of writing:

rustc --version --verbose:

rustc 1.49.0-nightly (5404efc28 2020-11-11)
binary: rustc
commit-hash: 5404efc28a0cddee103ef6396c48ea71ff9631c8
commit-date: 2020-11-11
host: x86_64-pc-windows-msvc
release: 1.49.0-nightly

I can provide any file or other precision if necessary !

Thanks for reading my report !

@nunolucas
Copy link

I was also having the some issue and tracked it to this: dc004d4#diff-aa810a3be0834da891b171a8b04b09d0d3bbb76ac27c757cd232235099e062d2R1309

That commit broke the equivalence between "target_endian" and "target-endian" by adding a case to the key!() macro without the replace line for it.

@jonas-schievink jonas-schievink added A-target-specs Area: compile-target specifications C-bug Category: This is a bug. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 12, 2020
@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

cc @petrochenkov

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

I'll fix this today.

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed in #78993.

@parraman
Copy link

I hope this gets merged asap :-)

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

(Reopening because #78993 isn't merged yet.)

@petrochenkov petrochenkov reopened this Nov 13, 2020
@bors bors closed this as completed in 96fc0f4 Nov 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-target-specs Area: compile-target specifications C-bug Category: This is a bug. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants