RFC 0198 slice notation 翻譯

[FizzyElt]

有幾個地方我覺得不太通順的，麻煩各位給予一些建議

https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0198-slice-notation.html#ergonomics

Ergonomics 有什麼更好的詞彙來代替 "人體工學"
blanket implementation 繁體中文應該怎麼範才符合語意

• The as_slice operator is particularly important. Since we've moved away from auto-slicing in coercions, explicit as_slice calls have become extremely common, and are one of the leading ergonomic/first impression problems with the language. There are a few other approaches to address this particular problem, but these alternatives have downsides that are discussed below (see "Alternatives").
• The reason to change the notation, rather than the interpretation, is that the exclusive (respectively inclusive) interpretation is the right default for slicing (respectively matching).
• Like the Index trait, this forces the result to be a reference via &, which may rule out some generalizations of slicing.
• It should be possible to transition from the current Index and Slice trait designs to an HKT version in the future without breaking backwards compatibility by using blanket implementations of the new traits (say, IndexHKT) for types that implement the old ones.

[CYBAI]

目前看到缺點以前，先把可以討論的部分留言上來 🙏

[FizzyElt]

我已經修改了一些。剩下 Ergonomics 這個字最後決定如何翻譯，麻煩各位了

[FizzyElt]

以將 ergonomics 改為人因工程

[weihanglo]

Thanks. Going to merge this.