Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

0.23 release preparation #1777

Closed
8 tasks done
cpu opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 9 comments
Closed
8 tasks done

0.23 release preparation #1777

cpu opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 9 comments

Comments

@cpu
Copy link
Member

cpu commented Feb 8, 2024

@cpu
Copy link
Member Author

cpu commented Feb 8, 2024

I've proposed a handful of items to consider blocking on.

I think #1640 is very close and probably uncontroversial. I'm not sure if we want to roll #1774 in as well.

It feels important to tie a bow on the outstanding changes Quinn needs in #1741.

I think we're missing an issue to link for switching the default provider.

@djc
Copy link
Member

djc commented Feb 9, 2024

This list looks good to me!

@ctz ctz pinned this issue Feb 9, 2024
@cpu
Copy link
Member Author

cpu commented Feb 15, 2024

Added #1784 & #1789 to the list.

@cpu
Copy link
Member Author

cpu commented Feb 23, 2024

Thinking about #1502 and 0.23 - I don't think it's a must-have, but it might also not be something we could turn around in a 0.23.1.

I think (writing this out in case I'm wrong) adding the std feature and putting it in the default features list is a breaking change because there are folks that could be using rustls with default-features = false who would now need to add std to the features they enable, or suffer breakage from API surface disappearing.

@ctz
Copy link
Member

ctz commented Feb 23, 2024

Yes, unfortunately I think any change to the default feature list is a breaking change :(

@cpu
Copy link
Member Author

cpu commented Feb 23, 2024

Thanks for confirming. I put it in the list as a nice-to-have. Looking forward I think pt2 could be landed without breaking changes so it would be ideal if we could fit pt1 into this release, but if it doesn't happen it would be OK knowing there's further work to be done in either case.

@djc
Copy link
Member

djc commented Feb 27, 2024

Would be nice to get #1811 in.

@cpu
Copy link
Member Author

cpu commented Feb 27, 2024

Would be nice to get #1811 in.

Added to the list. It's in the merge queue now.

@cpu
Copy link
Member Author

cpu commented Feb 29, 2024

v0.23.0 was published this morning 🚀

@cpu cpu closed this as completed Feb 29, 2024
@cpu cpu unpinned this issue Feb 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants