-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 595
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
connect-tests: ignore rsa8192.badssl.com #1886
Conversation
This test server's certificate has expired. The issue has been flagged with the upstream project. Until resolved let's ignore this test.
Here's a successful run that I invoked manually with the workflow dispatch. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1886 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.48% 95.48%
=======================================
Files 86 86
Lines 18624 18624
=======================================
Hits 17784 17784
Misses 840 840 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Benchmark resultsInstruction countsSignificant differencesThere are no significant instruction count differences Other differencesClick to expand
Wall-timeSignificant differencesThere are no significant wall-time differences Other differencesClick to expand
Additional informationCheckout details:
|
I'm confused because I had missed these failures. Do you get notifications? I seem to recall we've encountered this (some people being notified while others aren't) but have forgotten the details. |
I only get notifications by trying to remember to sync my forks periodically. I reliably seem to get failure emails that way, but it requires manual effort. Otherwise I think GitHub only sends notifications to whoever last edited the workflow.... It's very crummy. The best idea I've for a workaround is to configure our repo with a webhook that dumps failures into the Discord in a bot-specific channel. It seems like a big hammer to wield but I don't know if there are good alternatives :-( |
Would be nice... but yeah, sounds hard? |
I dug up the reference I found before and it's more nuanced:
|
I think ( 🤞 ) it would be pretty easy (a bit of clicking around for someone that has admin privs both here and for the Discord server). The main hesitation I have is that Discord's notification policy is very "on-by-default" and the many folks in the Discord would each have to mute the new bot channel to avoid seeing chatter they might not care about. |
Maybe a private channel, so that we can make it opt-in? |
That's a good idea. Maybe I can try and prototype something with a private repo/discord and then share the steps I used so that you could replicate it w/ the "production" discord/repo. |
This test server's certificate has expired, breaking the connect tests portion of the daily CI jobs since March 27th. The issue has been flagged with the upstream project (chromium/badssl.com#530, chromium/badssl.com#499 (comment)). Until resolved let's ignore this test.