Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ruby 2.3.1 (MRI) is not "known" by rvm get stable #3732

Closed
mattscilipoti opened this issue Aug 18, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

ruby 2.3.1 (MRI) is not "known" by rvm get stable #3732

mattscilipoti opened this issue Aug 18, 2016 · 5 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@mattscilipoti
Copy link

When I list known versions, via rvm list known it indicates that 2.3.0 is the latest release. 2.3.1 was released on 04/26/2016. Is there a reason for this oversight?

The (annotated) output:

$ rvm list known
# MRI Rubies
[ruby-]1.8.6[-p420]
...
[ruby-]2.2[.4]
[ruby-]2.3[.0]
[ruby-]2.2-head
ruby-head
...

I'll start researching how to update this and how to contribute an OSX binary.

@mattscilipoti
Copy link
Author

Note: this was performed using rvm get latest.

$ rvm --version
rvm 1.27.0 (latest) by Wayne E. Seguin <wayneeseguin@gmail.com>, Michal Papis <mpapis@gmail.com> [https://rvm.io/]

@mattscilipoti
Copy link
Author

https://rvm.io/rvm/upgrading indicates that rvm get latest has been repaced by rvm get stable. That leaves me at rvm 1.27.0.

@mattscilipoti mattscilipoti changed the title ruby 2.3.1 (MRI) is not "known" ruby 2.3.1 (MRI) is not "known" by rvm get stable Aug 18, 2016
@mattscilipoti
Copy link
Author

More findings: config/known, on master branch, indicates [ruby-]2.3[.1]. It was added on Apr 28, 2016 via 2f8549f#diff-278dcece756e75611dd08c63d01cc4b2.

Maybe "stable" hasn't been updated for a while?

@mattscilipoti
Copy link
Author

Confirmed: Last commit to "stable" was March 29, 2016: https://github.com/rvm/rvm/tree/stable

I'm not sure what the release process is. Is there a reason for not pushing to "stable"? Is there anything I can do to help?

@pkuczynski
Copy link
Member

pkuczynski commented Sep 14, 2016

Run

rvm get master
rvm install ruby-2.3.1

and this will solve your problem. We are working on getting current RVM master to stable, but it needs some extra time...

@pkuczynski pkuczynski modified the milestone: rvm-1.28.0 Nov 8, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants