Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes checksums for ruby 2.6.4 #4769

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 28, 2019
Merged

Fixes checksums for ruby 2.6.4 #4769

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 28, 2019

Conversation

pcarn
Copy link
Member

@pcarn pcarn commented Aug 28, 2019

#4768 added Ruby 2.6.4, but used the checksums from the .tar.gz package instead of .tar.bz2, so it's failing to install.

@koic note that .tar.bz2 should be used.

@pkuczynski Ruby 2.6.4 fails to install until this is merged.

ruby-2.6.4 - #downloading ruby-2.6.4, this may take a while depending on your connection...
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 13.7M  100 13.7M    0     0  24.2M      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 24.2M
Downloaded archive checksum did not match, archive was removed!
If you wish to continue with not matching download add '--verify-downloads 2' after the command.

There has been an error fetching the ruby interpreter. Halting the installation.

@koic
Copy link
Member

koic commented Aug 28, 2019

@pcarn That's my fault 💦 I should have used tar.bz2 instead of tar.gz. Thank you for the patch.

Copy link
Member

@pkuczynski pkuczynski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! :)

@pkuczynski pkuczynski added this to the rvm-1.29.10 milestone Aug 28, 2019
@pkuczynski pkuczynski added the bug label Aug 28, 2019
@pkuczynski pkuczynski merged commit 38e0de8 into rvm:master Aug 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants