Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document unsupported plugins #149

Closed
goldhand opened this issue Jul 26, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Document unsupported plugins #149

goldhand opened this issue Jul 26, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@goldhand
Copy link
Collaborator

goldhand commented Jul 26, 2016

There are a few issues using some unsupported plugins (particularly commons). It would be nice to document unsupported plugins and possibly provide an example that separates a webpack test config eloquently.

Issues mentioning unsupported plugins:

@goldhand goldhand changed the title Document supported plugins Document unsupported plugins Jul 26, 2016
@joshwiens
Copy link
Contributor

Sticking this here as a note for after we have proper code validations in place.

In regards to Commons, @wied03 took a rather elegant approach in which he first normalized the entry points thus supporting the use of commons-chunk which at least appears to be a feature people are interested in.

https://github.com/wied03/karma_webpack_2/blob/376fe55720ab9eb7a368d1a610c6867b98ec133c/lib/index.js#L53-L57

At minimum, it's worth further discussion at the appropriate time.

@aindlq
Copy link

aindlq commented Oct 27, 2016

It is also not possible to use Webpack DLL plugin, I think the reason is the same as for CommonsChunk plugin.

fraziermork added a commit to fraziermork/karma-webpack that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2016
Add note of which plugins are unsupported based on issue codymikol#149
@frankandrobot
Copy link

Wait wat? Webpack DLL is unsupported? Is this still true with webpack 2?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants