Set owner/group to root/root when unarchiving kata-containers #1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Set owner/group to root/root when unarchiving kata-containers binary to prevent kata-containers binaries/directories and especially / from getting chowned to 1001:123, the file owner specified in the kata-containers archive
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
The unarchiving task in the kata-containers role sets the owner/group of the kata-containers directories and files to the owner/group specified in the archive, which is 1001:123. Because the archive is unarchived in
/, the owner/group of/is changed to1001:123too which is not wanted and breaks stuff.Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: