Duplicate Assmelber on S-Disk Should Be Removed

[marXtevens]

It seems that ASMAHL and ASSEMBLE modules on the S-Disk are identical.

q time
TIME IS 01:16:24 GMT SUNDAY 11/21/21
CONNECT= 25:14:01 VIRTCPU= 000:00.51 TOTCPU= 000:01.43
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 01:16:24
xcompare asmahl module s assemble module s
 
COMPARISON COMPLETED - RETURN CODE IS     0.
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 01:16:28

If that is the case ASMAHL should be removed as the name conflicts with an IBM licensed product, and we don't need to get in hot water with them.

https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=cms-invoking-assembler

l assemble * * ( date
Filename Filetype Fm  Format    Recs Blocks     Date    Time
ASSEMBLE MODULE   S2  V  8192      3     11  07/22/05   12:50
ASSEMBLE HELPCMD  U2  V    79    206     14  06/09/09   18:12
ASSEMBLE HELPCMD2 U2  V    79     63      5  06/09/09   18:12
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 01:13:13
l ASMAHL * * ( date
Filename Filetype Fm  Format    Recs Blocks     Date    Time
ASMAHL   MODULE   S2  V  8192      3     11  07/22/05   12:50
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 01:13:22
l ifox00 * * ( date
Filename Filetype Fm  Format    Recs Blocks     Date    Time
IFOX00   MODULE   S2  V  2904      3      4  07/22/05   12:59
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 01:13:38

[BobBolch]

The consensus is that the ASMAHL MODULE on the Sixpack and Community Editions is harmless, and simplifies the port of the GCC compiler to CMS. The MODULE will remain in place on future releases.