Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support off chain Contract Signatures #52

Closed
Uxio0 opened this issue Jan 21, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Support off chain Contract Signatures #52

Uxio0 opened this issue Jan 21, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@Uxio0

Comments

@Uxio0
Copy link
Member

Uxio0 commented Jan 21, 2020 •
edited

Currently just on chain contract signatures are supported.

  • Service should parse EIP1271 signatures in Gnosis Safe format.✔️
  • Service should allow EIP1271 without Gnosis Safe format (contractAddress, messageHash and signature), even if service returns it using Gnosis Safe format❌
  • When returning all the signatures, signature must be crafted depending on the other signatures so the pointer to the dynamic part matches.❌
@Uxio0 Uxio0 self-assigned this Jan 21, 2020
Uxio0 added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 31, 2020
@Uxio0
Implement offchain signatures #52
0a7536e 
- Support EOA, Approved Hashes, Contract signatures and EthSign
@Uxio0
Copy link
Member Author

Uxio0 commented Apr 14, 2020 •
edited

  • Service should parse EIP1271 signatures in Gnosis Safe format.✔️
  • Service supports Approved Hashes. ✔️
  • Service supports eth_sign ✔️
  • Service supports EOA signatures ✔️
  • When returning all the signatures, signature must be crafted depending on the other signatures so the pointer to the dynamic part matches.✔️
  • Service supports multiple signature in one call to POST✔️

@Uxio0 Uxio0 closed this as completed Apr 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Uxio0 Uxio0

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Uxio0