Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set up GH Actions workflow for ticket dependencies #78

Open
mkoeppe opened this issue Jan 1, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Set up GH Actions workflow for ticket dependencies #78

mkoeppe opened this issue Jan 1, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member

mkoeppe commented Jan 1, 2023

As suggested in ​​https://github.com/sagemath/publications/pull/142#issuecomment-1259001501 and ​​https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/hX6ojxlNwOU/m/dup_Ywu1BQAJ, we should add to ​the transition guide how to model Trac's ticket dependencies in GitHub PRs.
See ​​https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/4477 for solutions.

Our migration script emits the phrase "Depends on ...", which is used by several solutions (https://www.dpulls.com/ https://github.com/z0al/dependent-issues gregsdennis/dependencies-action#5). This is already documented in the transition guide.

It remains to select one of the solutions and to set up GH Actions workflow.

@tobiasdiez
Copy link

At Jabref we also looked into this at some point but then decided not to proceed with this due to various issues and limited gains. I also don't know of any high-profile repository that has formalised PR dependencies.

Instead, I would suggest to look for solutions that allow PRs to be merged in a timely manner and where merge conflicts with the main branch are not a big deal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants