285 Bugzilla Downloader Refresher #293
Conversation
This is not finished and has not been tested yet.
The download_bugzilla_rest_issues_comments function now takes 3 more parameters, project_key, comments, and verbose. It is now able to download issues or issues with comments depending on the comments parameter.
R/bugzilla.R
Outdated
| save_folder_path, | ||
| project_key, | ||
| limit_upperbound = 500, | ||
| comments = FALSE, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inside parameter:
comments = c(TRUE, FALSE)
Inside function:
comments <- match.arg(comments)
R/bugzilla.R
Outdated
| #' @seealso \code{\link{parse_bugzilla_rest_issues_comments}} a parser function to parse Bugzilla issues and comments data | ||
| #' @export | ||
| download_bugzilla_rest_issues_comments <- function(bugzilla_site, start_timestamp, save_folder_path, limit_upperbound = 500) { | ||
| download_bugzilla_rest_issues_comments <- function(bugzilla_site, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rename function to download_bugzilla_rest_issues_comments_by_date.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Create a new function called download_bugzilla_rest_issues_comments. This function should have the exact code logic as this one except it will have a query parameter.
Then, the download_bugzilla_rest_issues_comments_by_date calls the function (download_bugzilla_rest_issues_comments) specifying the query parameter to be
?creation_time=", start_timestamp, "&include_fields=_default,comments", "&limit=", limit, "&offset=", offset if comments = TRUE,
or else
?creation_time=", start_timestamp, "&limit=", limit, "&offset=", offset if comments = FALSE.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the refresh function, call the by date function here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic for the naming convention of the files is in the download_bugzilla_rest_issues_comments.
I separated the API call into a different function so that it can be used by other queries in the future. I also finished the code for the refresher.
|
@anthonyjlau is this review ready? |
|
@carlosparadis The code works and can be reviewed. I wanted to make some more changes to it though to add back the documentation and clean up the variable names. |
|
@anthonyjlau go for it, I still need to review the other PR first |
I added comments to the downloader functions and fixed the parser.
No description provided.