-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
best-cli module needs to be moved into the @best scope #147
Comments
I would love to, but I need to claim the @best scope first so we can open source it eventually |
We can move this into the @best scope in the private npm.lwcjs.org repository where the other best modules already exist right? |
For the public registry, it seems @diervo has the |
@diervo Let's change the name =) |
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
best-cli module should be moved into the @best scope along with the rest of the best packages.
An npm package that consumes best will have a .npmrc file with the following in it:
@best:registry=https://npm.lwcjs.org
which allows the private registry to be used to get the best packages. However this doesn't work for best-cli because it is not in the @best scope.
As a current workaround, a consumer has to directly put the URI of the tarball in their package.json dependencies map.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: