Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

best-cli module needs to be moved into the @best scope #147

Closed
a-hoff opened this issue Mar 27, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

best-cli module needs to be moved into the @best scope #147

a-hoff opened this issue Mar 27, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@a-hoff
Copy link
Contributor

a-hoff commented Mar 27, 2019

best-cli module should be moved into the @best scope along with the rest of the best packages.

An npm package that consumes best will have a .npmrc file with the following in it:
@best:registry=https://npm.lwcjs.org

which allows the private registry to be used to get the best packages. However this doesn't work for best-cli because it is not in the @best scope.

As a current workaround, a consumer has to directly put the URI of the tarball in their package.json dependencies map.

@diervo
Copy link
Contributor

diervo commented Mar 27, 2019

I would love to, but I need to claim the @best scope first so we can open source it eventually

@a-hoff
Copy link
Contributor Author

a-hoff commented Mar 28, 2019

We can move this into the @best scope in the private npm.lwcjs.org repository where the other best modules already exist right?

@alrra
Copy link
Collaborator

alrra commented Apr 11, 2019

For the public registry, it seems @diervo has the best package, but @best is already claimed by someone.

@pmdartus
Copy link
Member

@diervo Let's change the name =)

@jasonsilberman
Copy link
Contributor

@best/cli is live with an alpha of v4.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants