Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

@W-13102797 [M6 Automation LOB] Enable ^ Power operator for offline … #118

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

aditya-jain3
Copy link
Collaborator

@aditya-jain3 aditya-jain3 commented May 3, 2023

@W-13102797
[M6 Automation LOB] Enable ^ Power operator for offline support

…upport

@W-13102797
[M6 Automation LOB] Enable ^ Power operator for offline support
@salesforce-cla
Copy link

salesforce-cla bot commented May 3, 2023

Thanks for the contribution! It looks like @aditya-jain3 is an internal user so signing the CLA is not required. However, we need to confirm this.

@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
* @author djacobs
* @since 140
*/
@AllowedContext(section = SelectorSection.MATH) // Not supported in offline because of the precision loss.
@AllowedContext(section = SelectorSection.MATH,isOffline=true)
// We are enabling support for offline. But in case of High precision, result might be different than the result from SQL.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should add tests to sure this function works offline. Also we should add concrete tests between SQL vs offline with high precision enabled.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants