Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH-16780: add hardlink function to file exec/state modules #20428

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

GH-16780: add hardlink function to file exec/state modules #20428

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

systembell
Copy link
Contributor

This change resolves #16780, adding a hardlink function to the file state and execution modules. It makes does not perform any mount point checking, thus assumes that the operator knows if the target and dest reside on the same filesystem (it will throw an OSError if an attempt is made to create a hard link across devices).

@thatch45
Copy link
Member

thatch45 commented Feb 5, 2015

@atbell this is a feature addition and should be made to the develop branch please

@systembell systembell closed this Feb 5, 2015
@tankywoo
Copy link
Contributor

@thatch45 , @Pravka Hi, how about this pr?I couldn't found this pr again in develop branch?

@systembell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @tankywoo, I totally forgot to re-open this for develop. I'll try and get it in soon.

@tankywoo
Copy link
Contributor

@Pravka Cool 👍

@brevilo
Copy link

brevilo commented Apr 22, 2016

@Pravka any update? This one is still closed but doesn't seem to have been merged so far and the original issue is also still open...

Thanks (urgently needed)

@arizvisa
Copy link
Contributor

arizvisa commented Oct 14, 2019

Since this appeared to have been dropped. I implemented PR #55000 which is based on this PR.

Hopefully it gets merged. Writing the unit tests for new features (especially states) is probably one of the most painful things in the world. I want graphs in saltstack.

arizvisa added a commit to arizvisa/saltstack-salt that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants