Update aliases.py #24659
Merged
Update aliases.py #24659
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixes saltstack#24537. Also note: the new behavior overwrites any prior superset targets with the current set. For example, given an /etc/aliases entry "a: b,c,d" and the salt state specified as "a: { alias.present: [ target: b ] }", the /etc/aliases entry is changed to "a: b". This seems okay to me, given that the documentation states "If the alias exists but the target differs from the previous entry, the target(s) will be overwritten."
|
Very nice fix, thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #24537. Also note: the new behavior overwrites any prior superset targets with the current set. For example, given an /etc/aliases entry "a: b,c,d" and the salt state specified as "a: { alias.present: [ target: b ] }", the /etc/aliases entry is changed to "a: b". This seems okay to me, given that the documentation states "If the alias exists but the target differs from the previous entry, the target(s) will be overwritten."