Don't try to cache a template when it's not a file #24987
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
justinta
added
Execution-Module
Minor Change
Core
|
@heewa Thanks for this PR as well! |
cachedout
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2015
Don't try to cache a template when it's not a file
|
Thanks, @heewa |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When trying to use
file.managedwithout a source file, justcontents, with templating,modules/file.pytries to cache the template itself, but in this case it's not a file, so an Exception is raised when it tries to do string stuff to aNone, which gets caught and turned into a confusing string error, shown to the user.This PR fixes this issue by avoiding trying to cache a nonexistent file.