Foreman pillar #31705
Merged
Foreman pillar #31705
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
At the office, I have extended this to be a drop-in replacement for foreman-node, in terms of what the pillar data contains. I can submit that as a separate merge request, if you want it. Obviously, it would be possible to make that a configuration option. |
|
Thanks, @peripatetic-sojourner |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Allows successful loading of foreman as ext pillar. Also, reduces number of API calls and populates pillar data off of global and group based parameters, in addition to host based.
What issues does this PR fix or reference?
#31704