Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2015.8] Merge forward from 2015.5 to 2015.8 #31904

Merged
merged 34 commits into from Mar 16, 2016

Conversation

rallytime
Copy link
Contributor

Conflicts:

  • .testing.pylintrc
  • salt/cloud/clouds/joyent.py

whiteinge and others added 30 commits March 10, 2016 19:48
Fix outdated Jinja 'env' variable reference
This should be set at the master level, so that whoever is
authenticating has to conform to what is set by the administrator that
setup salt.
This should be set at the master level, so that whoever is
authenticating has to conform to what is set by the administrator that
setup salt.
Remove ability of authenticating user to specify pam service
Remove ability of authenticating user to specify pam service
[2015.5] Merge forward from 2014.7 to 2015.5
Make sure __virtual__ error message is helpful when psutil is missing
Add "python module" clarification to ps __virtual__ warning.
Updated .testing.pylintrc to match newer versions of pylint
Conflicts:
  - .testing.pylintrc
  - salt/cloud/clouds/joyent.py
@cachedout
Copy link
Contributor

@rallytime and @jtand It looks like something may have gone wrong with that merge conflict in the new pylintrc. Could you guys take a look?

@rallytime
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes it's not a merge conflict, but just new files in 2015.8 that need to be updated to the new pylint options. I'm looking into it now.

@cachedout
Copy link
Contributor

Ah, of course. Good point.

rallytime pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2016
[2015.8] Merge forward from 2015.5 to 2015.8
@rallytime rallytime merged commit 03e8b72 into saltstack:2015.8 Mar 16, 2016
@rallytime rallytime deleted the merge-2015.8 branch March 16, 2016 17:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants