Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IVA sensitivity threshold #72

Closed
antoine4ucsd opened this issue Mar 15, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

IVA sensitivity threshold #72

antoine4ucsd opened this issue Mar 15, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@antoine4ucsd
Copy link

Hi,
I am new with IVA. I am analyzing Illumina HIV data (paired end) with reads ~250-350 bp covering regions of up to ~2kb.
With my local pipeline, I cleaned up and filtered the reads and got the allele frequencies along these regions. I was willing to use IVA for reconstructing representative variants for these regions.
With the standard command, it only generated one contig. I was wondering whether I could adjust some of the options to generate less predominant variants and not only the contig?
I tried various ways (e.g. smalt_id threshold) but I got one contig only though I am expecting some diversity.
Is there anything you could suggest as parameters to adapt to get more representative /less frequent haplotypes?
Can we get the contigs relative frequencies along with the contigs themselves?

thanks!!!!

example:
iva --smalt_id 0.01 --fr Data_Interleaved.fastq Output_dir

@martinghunt
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

The aim of IVA is to collapse everything down into one contig, which should represent the most common sequence in the reads. sorry, but investigating the various alleles/variants in the sample is a separate problem that IVA is not trying to solve. I suggest mapping the reads back to the contig and go from there.

@antoine4ucsd
Copy link
Author

thanks. I will go from there as you suggest.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants