Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GPL-815 Migration off travis #175

Closed
18 of 55 tasks
JamesGlover opened this issue Feb 5, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #176
Closed
18 of 55 tasks

GPL-815 Migration off travis #175

JamesGlover opened this issue Feb 5, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #176

Comments

@JamesGlover
Copy link
Contributor

This represents the unified_warehouse work required for sanger/General-Backlog-Items#109

Original issue:

Background

Travis are have changed their open-source free tier, which places heavy restrictions on our needs. We are currently on a paid plan, but are looking to migrate off.

I have made notes about the changes made to migrate Sequencescape here:
https://github.com/JamesGlover/travis_to_gh_actions

Migrated

  • Sequencescape
  • Warren

Still on travis, but some actions

These may already have all their actions migrated, although I think its mostly docker build files.
They should have all actions migrated, and be removed from travis

  • Baracoda
  • lighthouse-ui
  • samples_extraction
  • print_my_barcode

Repo to migrate

  • Traction
  • Asset Audits
  • Traction-ui
  • Quanthub
  • Sm_workflow_lims
  • sprint
  • eln_pmb_bridge [Can't see on travis.com]
  • mixtio
  • gatekeeper
  • baracoda
  • traction-service-automated-releases ? (What is this?)
  • traction-service
  • event_warehouse_ukbb
  • sanger_barcode_format
  • event_warehouse
  • unified_warehouse
  • limber
  • pmb-client
  • labwhere

Probably don't migrate

  • json_api_client
    This is a fork of another gem, which brings in some fixes. We should focus of migrating to the latest version, rather than maintaining a fork.

Repos without CI

These repos currently have no CI solution. In some cases its because one probably isn't warranted.

CI needed?

  • sequencescape-client-api
  • sprint_client
  • hca-print-tool
  • ftpcmd
  • warehouse_two

CI probably not needed

  • storelight-sql
  • config
  • .github
  • beckman-robot-scripts
  • deployment
  • provision
  • usg_scripts
  • ss_cherrypicking (Empty repo)
  • plate_barcode [ Migrate to baracoda instead ]
  • General backlog items
  • axlsx [Migrate to community fork instead of maintaining our own]
  • label_printer [Yana's tool, mostly replaced by steve's recent stuff, not sure how you'd ci the tests]
  • sequencescape_search [I don't think we use this?]
  • sanger_barcode [Legacy barcode printing]
  • irods_reader [Not using functionality]
  • psd_logger [No longer used?]

Repos already on GH actions

These repos either never used travis, or were migrated a while ago. I'm judging this by the presence of a .github/workflows folder

  • Record Loader(Never used travis)
  • Crawler
  • storelight
  • lighthouse
  • wrangler
  • stan-client
  • stan-core
  • automanual
JamesGlover pushed a commit to JamesGlover/unified_warehouse that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant