Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix static and exclude #80

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 10, 2019
Merged

fix static and exclude #80

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 10, 2019

Conversation

hampsterx
Copy link
Contributor

@hampsterx hampsterx commented Mar 28, 2019

relies on static route having "static" in the name, will fail to exclude if you name your static route but I think that is fine/acceptable?

@chenjr0719
Copy link
Member

I think this PR is ok to #36 and #75, but it would be nice if there are some related tests could be added. And, my understanding of #35, is talking about blueprint scoped swagger. I'm going to ask for more detail about that issue.

@chenjr0719
Copy link
Member

@ahopkins I'm adding test cases now and I found some problem related to unexpected behavior of static files. I think this PR already fix it. Please merge it if you are available.

@ahopkins ahopkins merged commit 42f53b7 into master Jun 10, 2019
@ahopkins ahopkins deleted the fix_static_and_exclude branch June 10, 2019 07:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

doc in blueprint still documents entire app
3 participants