-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
o
vs O
Corrections in PWG, Part 2
#137
Comments
No change words will be included in No change list. I guess it's time we start to collect them in a new TXT file, what do you say @drdhaval2785 ? |
Ask @funderburkjim. In earlier exercises where I was an active member for
correction finding, we mentioned the OK lists at the end of issues. Jim may
have stored or may retrieve from Github issues. It would be a good method
to note OK words at the end of the issues handled so far.
we can keep them in whitelist and not display them in next dictionaries
|
I'm afraid documenting in such detail takes more time than needed. Guess half would be 2 more than needed, @zaaf2 You are too good! |
MW: सार-मिति [p= 1208] : m. " measure of all truth ", N. of the वेद L. [L=242908] According to PWG and PW the meaning attributed to this word is the result of a misunderstanding, explained at Hemachandra’s Abhidhana Chintamani (1964 ed.), 248, but I could not find the passage. If I am not mistaken the etymology quoted by PWG सारं यथार्थं मीयते ज्ञायते ऽनेन could be translated as: “The essence [सारम् i.e. the real thing] is truly measured [and] known through this [Veda]”. |
|
There is no अजीन. |
@funderburkjim Since the cases from |
Treat the first dictionary only. e.g. PWG maDukari - MW maDukArI Those who intend to cover MW e.g. @gasyoun would handle it in MW, where it would be the first dictionary. NOTE - Till date we are concentrating only on 'Highest probability' ones only. If @zaaf2 ventures into the second slot of 'Medium probability' it would be great. Sooner or later, we would have to deal them. But in my opinion, it should wait till we exhaust 'Highest probability' of all dictionaries. Then we take up the 'Medium' of all. |
@drdhaval2785 what you tell does not makes sense. It made sense a year ago, if there would be only 1 person working and even than partly. I wanted to comment in detail, but let me do it later than never. If working with PWG @zaaf2 finds a MW error and ignores it - it does not makes sense. The very way he works is documenting everything and reinventing the wheel does not sounds great. When working quickly, 5 times quicker than I and 10 times quicker than @zaaf2 (because he is too good!) - I agree, ignore everything and run. But we are slower, much slower. So benefiting each other does not hurt at all. Sure a system is needed. After stating I disagree that Just because My understanding is that major dictionaries should come first. MW, PW, PWG, AP (without word endings, "cleaned"). High priority, Low priority and Medium ( |
@gasyoun They are composite files. This would ensure that we are going one by one, ignoring the dictionary to be corrected. |
This would also reduce the burden, and make sure we are not handling the same word again and again in different dictionaries. |
Good work. 3800 high, 1100 medium, 14000 low - low is far too big. Give me longer words first. No need to have them ordered alphabetically. |
Re. 5 73888 citraSAkApUpaBakzyavikArakriyA ― citraSAkapUpaBakzyavikArakriyA No change. Alternative forms. PWG & PW give an alternative form, as is clear from the entry’s text. MW:
|
I consider my mission accomplished. Now it's up to @funderburkjim to review and install changes. |
Let there be Jim. |
Re '107. शक्राग्नी ― शक्राग्नि' This is interesting when one contemplates using the PWG lexicon as a source for generating declension tables. For such a purpose, the given headword form 'SakrAgnI' is NOT the stem, but rather the short-i form 'SakrAgni'. This phenomenon of dual-form as the citation form was encountered in MW. There, we (Peter and Chandrashekar mostly) developed a list of such forms, and used that list in deriving the 'lexical grammar' for nominal forms. See DualPlural.txt. |
@zaaf2 re '116. अजिनपत्री ← अजीनपत्री Print error in SKD.' There IS an ajIna in PD: This was discovered from hwnorm1. Thus, I would demur, and be disinclined to changed SKD. |
Here are the harvested changes:
@zaaf2 might check the list and be sure I've not made mistakes. Will now go about installation. |
Corrections installed. Can revise if @zaaf2 finds mistakes in processing. |
#130 continued.
Checking the divergences detected by the o_vs_O method of highest probability (one dictionary in first word and more dictionaries in second word), as applied to PWG, at the file http://drdhaval2785.github.io/o_vs_O/output1/PWG.html.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: