We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Thank U for ur job. When i'm reading ur codes, i was confused the code style, such as:
nodetype = start_node.nodeName.lower() name = start_node.getAttribute('name').lower() context = start_node.getAttribute('context').lower() mutex = start_node.getAttribute('mutex').lower() cancel = start_node.getAttribute('cancel').lower() success = start_node.getAttribute('success').lower() times = start_node.getAttribute('times').lower() times_field = start_node.getAttribute('times-field').lower() threshold = start_node.getAttribute('threshold').lower() threshold_field = start_node.getAttribute('threshold-field').lower() file = start_node.getAttribute('file').lower() file_field = start_node.getAttribute('file-field').lower()
see http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#id16
and
type(context) != type([])
just use
isinstance(context, list)
_spec_map.has_key(child_node.nodeName.lower()):
child_node.nodeName.lower() in _spec_map
. Thank U.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not worth the effort IMO, though I may accept patches.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Merge pull request #29 from sartography/126-dmn-dict-update
6fc6841
126 dmn dict update
No branches or pull requests
Thank U for ur job.
When i'm reading ur codes, i was confused the code style, such as:
see http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#id16
and
just use
and
just use
.
Thank U.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: