Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix for a serialization bug #216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 6, 2022
Merged

Conversation

danfunk
Copy link
Collaborator

@danfunk danfunk commented Sep 6, 2022

Added a test to assure we could serialize and deserialize safely. We… were trying to serialize a tuple which isn't handled very well, so changed this to a dictionary. I noticed a FIXME about dropping the type, and so went ahead and added it in. Feel free to merge this, or just pull out the things you think are helpful.

…were trying to serialize a tuple which isn't handled very well, so changed this to a dictionary. I noticed a FIXME about dropping the type, and so went ahead and added it in. Feel free to merge this, or just pull out the things you think are helpful.
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 6, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@jbirddog jbirddog merged commit 3896dc0 into feature/service_task Sep 6, 2022
@jbirddog jbirddog deleted the feature/service_task_b branch September 6, 2022 20:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants