Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow downloading a process model, and then re-uploading it #394

Closed
danfunk opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Allow downloading a process model, and then re-uploading it #394

danfunk opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@danfunk
Copy link
Contributor

danfunk commented Jul 13, 2023

Currently we require that all process ids are unique across the whole system. This is required because call activities need to be able to unique reference another process in the system.

I suggest that we modify the process id when you are uploading the file, and just do this transparently, or perhaps with an alert message to let folks know that the process id was modified.

@vkuehn
Copy link

vkuehn commented Jul 14, 2023

Every process model should be unique as the execution of it, thought

Still imports with different id's would be great.E.G loading models as templates or from examples would only be possible with that.

If you implement a solution can you kindly also give a hint how to do it scripted and / or with a process?

@vkuehn
Copy link

vkuehn commented Jul 17, 2023

changing the ID manually did work

related to the command line question

probably one can be closed and a future version could ease life for template usage

@burnettk
Copy link
Contributor

thanks for the update, @vkuehn . i think for the command line question a wrong link ended up in the comment. i'm guessing it should have been sartography/spiff-example-cli#24.

@vkuehn
Copy link

vkuehn commented Jul 20, 2023

ups you are right, excuse me please.

corrected the comment for the sake of quality

@danfunk
Copy link
Contributor Author

danfunk commented Sep 14, 2023

This is fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Resolved
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants