-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
close the side nav when you select an item to navigate to #1255
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent updates introduce a new functionality to enhance user interaction with the side navigation menu. Functions within the Changes
Related issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Files selected for processing (1)
- spiffworkflow-frontend/src/components/NavigationBar.tsx (9 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
spiffworkflow-frontend/src/components/NavigationBar.tsx (3)
- 174-180: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [177-200]
The addition of the
closeSideNavMenuIfExpanded
parameter to theconfigurationElement
function aligns with the PR objectives and is implemented correctly. Ensure to verify the integration and potential side effects of this change in the broader application context.
- 244-250: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [237-300]
The implementation of the
closeSideNavMenuIfExpanded
parameter within theheaderMenuItems
function is consistent and correct. It's applied to multiple navigation items, enhancing the user experience as intended. Ensure to verify the integration and potential side effects of this change in the broader application context.
- 340-363: The implementation of the
onClick
handler in theHeaderName
component to callcloseSideNavMenuIfExpanded
is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. This change is crucial for improving the user experience. Ensure to verify the integration and potential side effects of this change in the broader application context.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Files selected for processing (1)
- spiffworkflow-frontend/src/ContainerForExtensions.tsx (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
spiffworkflow-frontend/src/ContainerForExtensions.tsx (3)
- 2-2: The addition of
useLocation
fromreact-router-dom
is appropriate for accessing the current location object, which is used later in the file to clear error messages when navigating to a different path. This is a good use of React Router's capabilities.- 22-22: The introduction of the
useAPIError
custom hook is a good practice for managing API errors in a centralized manner. It's important to ensure that this hook is well-documented and tested, given its critical role in error handling.- 42-53: The logic to clear error messages when navigating to a different path is sound. However, the comment on line 51 about not including
removeError
in the dependency array ofuseEffect
to avoid an infinite loop raises a concern. While it's true that including functions in the dependency array can lead to infinite loops if those functions are re-created on each render, the proper solution is to ensure thatremoveError
is memoized (usinguseCallback
) in its definition withinuseAPIError
. This ensures thatremoveError
does not change across renders unless its own dependencies change, which should be none in this case.Consider memoizing the
removeError
function within theuseAPIError
hook usinguseCallback
to safely include it in the dependency array ofuseEffect
and adhere to React's best practices for hooks.
previously this had been happening by accident because we were doing a full page reload when selecting an item
addresses #1253 and #1252
Summary by CodeRabbit