Support top level data stores, not exposed via the UI yet

[jbirddog]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved the location search functionality by ensuring consistent results.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent update involves appending an empty string to the list of locations in both the upsearch_locations function within the upsearch_service.py file and its corresponding unit test test_upsearch_locations. This change is aimed at modifying the behavior of the location search functionality, potentially to handle edge cases or specific conditions more effectively.

Changes

File(s)	Summary
.../services/upsearch_service.py, .../unit/test_upsearch_service.py	An empty string is appended to the locations list to modify search behavior.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c36ed57 and a39c180.

Files selected for processing (2)

• spiffworkflow-backend/src/spiffworkflow_backend/services/upsearch_service.py (1 hunks)
• spiffworkflow-backend/tests/spiffworkflow_backend/unit/test_upsearch_service.py (1 hunks)

Additional comments: 1

spiffworkflow-backend/tests/spiffworkflow_backend/unit/test_upsearch_service.py (1)

• 16-16: The test update correctly reflects the change made to the upsearch_locations function by including an empty string in the expected locations list. This ensures the test accurately assesses the function's behavior with the new logic.

[coderabbitai]

Appending an empty string to the locations list may have implications on how search paths are used downstream. Ensure this behavior is explicitly intended and documented, as it could affect path resolution or matching logic in unexpected ways.

[jbirddog]

This is the entire point of the pr, allowing a top level location.

[coderabbitai]

@jbirddog: Understood, thank you for clarifying that the addition of an empty string to the locations list is a deliberate choice to enable a top-level location, aligning with the PR's objectives. It's essential to ensure this behavior is clearly documented, highlighting its purpose and potential impact on the system's search functionality. This will help other developers and users understand the rationale behind this change and how it integrates with the overall system design.