Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix issue 144 #148

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 26, 2023
Merged

Bugfix issue 144 #148

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 26, 2023

Conversation

jlwalke2
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 25, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #148 (df128b8) into master (ea1036e) will increase coverage by 0.15%.
The diff coverage is 78.04%.

❗ Current head df128b8 differs from pull request most recent head b7330c9. Consider uploading reports for the commit b7330c9 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #148      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.74%   65.89%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          54       54              
  Lines        4796     4815      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits         3153     3173      +20     
+ Misses       1643     1642       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 53.04% <31.70%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
unit 50.48% <78.04%> (+0.21%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/sasctl/_services/model_management.py 64.22% <40.00%> (+0.82%) ⬆️
src/sasctl/_services/workflow.py 77.96% <83.33%> (+10.39%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@jlwalke2 jlwalke2 merged commit 3e05219 into master Jan 26, 2023
@jlwalke2 jlwalke2 deleted the bugfix-issue_144 branch January 26, 2023 16:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

parameters 'input' is not working in function execute_model_workflow_definition
1 participant