Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix a bug when computing the mesh quality in parallel #360

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 6, 2023
Merged

Conversation

sblauth
Copy link
Owner

@sblauth sblauth commented Dec 6, 2023

Closes #359

@sblauth sblauth added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 6, 2023
@sblauth sblauth self-assigned this Dec 6, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (afdaeda) 92.29% compared to head (7f7565a) 92.29%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #360   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.29%   92.29%           
=======================================
  Files          84       84           
  Lines        6639     6642    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits         6127     6130    +3     
  Misses        512      512           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sblauth sblauth merged commit 4dd057d into main Dec 6, 2023
25 checks passed
@sblauth sblauth deleted the hotfix/2.0.13 branch December 6, 2023 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Mesh Quality is not computed correctly when using ghost_mode="shared_vertex" or "shared_facet"
1 participant