Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Atom from the docs. #2364

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 4, 2021
Merged

Remove Atom from the docs. #2364

merged 2 commits into from Jan 4, 2021

Conversation

ckipp01
Copy link
Member

@ckipp01 ckipp01 commented Jan 4, 2021

While it's sort of sad to do this, it's probably time to remove
Atom from the supported editors list in the docs. Since the plugin
is no longer maintained, Atom usage is lowering every year, and
the most recent survey had the lowest support shown for Atom, it's
probably as good as time as any.

Good times Atom.

While it's sort of sad to do this, it's probably time to remove
Atom from the supported editors list in the docs. Since the plugin
is no longer maintained, Atom usage is lowering every year, and
the most recent survey had the lowest support shown for Atom, it's
probably as good as time as any.

Good times Atom.
@@ -47,8 +47,6 @@ case classes remain.
- [IntelliJ IDEA](https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/discover-intellij-idea-for-scala.html):
the most widely used IDE for Scala using a re-implementation of the Scala
typechecker.
- [Scala IDE](http://scala-ide.org/): Eclipse-based IDE using the Scala
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also just went ahead and removed this. I really don't think it's a recommended alternative anymore. I saw a tweet this weekend about how mentioning this in various places and tutorial often cause confusion for newcomers to Scala, and I thought it was a valid point. I think we should remove this.

Copy link
Contributor

@tgodzik tgodzik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! It's a pity to see an editor go from the list 😓 but well it makes sense. I just added one comment, which I am unsure about.

website/i18n/en.json Show resolved Hide resolved
@ckipp01 ckipp01 merged commit 9350c17 into scalameta:main Jan 4, 2021
@ckipp01 ckipp01 deleted the atom branch January 4, 2021 17:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants