Router: use indent.{binPackXxx,afterInfix}Site
#4057
Conversation
| danglingParentheses.defnSite = false | ||
| binPack.defnSite = always | ||
| indent.defnSite = 2 | ||
| indent.binPackDefnSite = 4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why does it need to be separate to indent.defnSite, that seems to over complicate things
There was a problem hiding this comment.
how would you propose to do it? they have a requirement to use one indent when config style formatting is used, and a different one otherwise. which seems to mean one parameter is not enough...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's probably not possible any other way, but I don't see how this kind of option is useful for anyone to have some many different indents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you point me to the requirement, where it's defined?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nvm. I found it, but I am still not convinced it's more than just an OCD thing and doesn't really help in readability that much.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i think the reason it's useful to scala.js developers is that it visually distinguishes between clean config style formatting, and more readability-challenged binpack formatting. one of the reasons scala.js has not adopted scalafmt yet.
They are needed to implement scala.js style.