Don't allow indentation for macro definitions #2728
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kitbellew
approved these changes
Apr 14, 2022
It's not, I forgot that we remove irrelevant LFs |
From what I understand macros must exist as the only statement in a definition, which is way we can't have a block there and indentation should not be tried. Fixes scalameta#2727
tgodzik
force-pushed
the
fix-indented-macro
branch
from
92f1715
to
cc6275b
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
From what I understand macros must exist as the only statement in a definition, which is way we can't have a block there and indentation should not be tried.
Fixes #2727