Scanamo 1.0

[philwills]

Following on from #134, I'd like to get out a release based on Cats 1.0.0-MF. My plan is to use the same version for Scanamo, so it would also be 1.0.0-MF to try and avoid confusion. Scanamo is reasonably fully featured and stable now, so whilst I'd like to move to things like #135, I'm not planning on making that kind of large change in this timeframe.

Apart from moving to the latest versions of dependencies, the only change I'm planning is to deprecate all methods in Scanamo and ScanamoAsync apart from exec. Everything they do can be achieved without much more ceremony (less if more than one operation issued) using Table which is more flexible, so I'd like to make it clear that that's the preferred method.

I'm very keen to hear any feedback on this approach, but want to move forward to a release quickly.

[regiskuckaertz]

That's a great move! The less there are functions with side effects, the more it encourages the programmer to push them closer to the end of the world. I like the approach of some Scala libraries to call this function unsafeRun; I've seen it in scalaz, cats, doobie, http4s, et al.

[regiskuckaertz]

@philwills I suggest we close this one now that cats 1.0 is out.