New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide a global strict option #45
Comments
This issue is stale because it has had no activity for 60 days. It will be closed after 14 more days of no activity. |
@danwkennedy Do you think this feature would still be useful for you? |
@mattwelke I believe it'd still be useful, however, I've since left the company that uses this package. Thank you for following up though! It's good to see this project getting some love :) |
Thanks for responding. "Love" is a strong word. :P It's an old library from before the new JSON Schema standards. But I've agreed to maintain it. We're still using it in production. I'll close this, and people can reopen it if there's a need for the feature. |
I think this could be a useful option because it could prevent me from writing |
This issue is stale because it has had no activity for 60 days. It will be closed after 14 more days of no activity. |
We're going to move forward with a maintenance only approach for this library. We'll look for "would", not "could". If someone currently using it has a specific use case for a desired feature, we'd take it on. But we wouldn't add features for the sake of trying to grow the userbase, which isn't a goal right now. |
Instead of requiring each object set it's strict option, it'd be handy to just have a global type strict option. Most of the time, if I want one of my object rules to be strict, I want them all to be strict.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: